Canyon County Sheriff, Caldwell Police and Nampa Police | A shared phone-cracking task force
Canyon County, Caldwell and Nampa share the cost of Cellebrite software that unlocks and extracts seized phones, and a server to archive what comes off them. The Sheriff's Office pitched it in 2023 as a way to build a database of phones the agencies could cross-check.
At a glance
- Approved
- 19 September 2024, agreement no. 24-110, carried unanimously, conditionally: a signature page was missing and the Board approved on the condition it turn up [2]
- What it is
- A Treasure Valley Digital Forensic Task Force cost share agreement for Cellebrite Pathfinder and Guardian software [2]
- Who shares it
- Canyon County, the City of Caldwell and the City of Nampa, a three-way cost share as approved. The 2023 proposal had described four participants, adding the Prosecuting Attorney's Office [1] [2]
- What it does
- Unlocks and extracts data from seized cell phones. The 2023 proposal described unlimited unlocks and a shared server to archive the digital information [1]
- The 2023 proposal figures
- $21,900 a year with a one-time $4,750 for a shared server, against a total quote of $117,585 of which $19,000 was a server. Those are the figures the Sheriff's Office put to the Board in a budget session, not the 2024 agreement's terms [1]
- Renewal
- Annual, and not automatic [2]
- What the county paid
- The 2024 item records a three-way share with the county's portion slightly higher for equipment, and no figure [2]
How it happened
- Debate
The Sheriff's Office pitches it
In a budget session a Sheriff's Office chief describes seizing locked phones in investigations and proposes a shared Cellebrite package across four agencies, with unlimited unlocks, a shared server, and what he describes as a database of the phones the agencies could cross-check. The Sheriff speaks to its importance. No vote is taken; it is a budget project proposal. [1]
- Decision
Approved, with a signature missing
The Board considers the task force cost share agreement. The signature page carrying the Caldwell mayor's signature cannot be located, and the Board approves on the condition that it turn up, otherwise to return. A lieutenant tells the Board the county declined the year before on cost, that this is now a three-way share with Caldwell and Nampa, that renewal is annual and not automatic, and that both cities have had results with the system. A second motion to sign outright dies for want of a second. The original motion carries unanimously. [2]
A modern phone holds more about a person than a house search would have produced a generation ago. Cellebrite makes the tools that open one and copy what is inside. Three agencies in this county share a license for it, and a server to keep what comes off.
The pitch, in a budget session
In a 2023 budget session, a Sheriff’s Office chief explained the problem to the commissioners. Investigators frequently seize cell phones, the phones are often locked, and there are few solutions that will unlock and exploit one. He described Cellebrite as the leader in digital intelligence and investigative analytics.[1]
His proposal was that four agencies buy together: the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Caldwell Police, Nampa Police and the Sheriff’s Office. All four were already paying for the same kind of service separately and none was getting the highest level of it. Buying jointly would give all four much greater capabilities and unlimited numbers of unlocks. The proposal was to create a digital forensics task force between the agencies, share the cost of the best software, and, in his description, create a database of the phones they could cross-check.[1]
The figures he gave were $21,900 a year, a one-time $4,750 for a shared server to archive the digital information, against a total quote of $117,585 including $19,000 for a server. The Sheriff spoke to the importance of the product. No vote was taken; it was a project on a budget list.[1]
The decision, fifteen months later
On 19 September 2024 the agreement came to the Board: a Treasure Valley Digital Forensic Task Force cost share agreement for Cellebrite Pathfinder and Guardian software.[2]
It did not arrive cleanly. The signature page carrying the Caldwell mayor’s signature could not be located, and a commissioner moved to approve it conditionally: if the signed page turned up the contract was in effect, and if not the matter would return later that week. A lieutenant gave the history. The county had been asked to join the year before, found the cost higher than expected and declined. Asked again, it joined with Caldwell and Nampa in a three-way cost share, with the county’s portion slightly higher because of equipment it would need to buy. Renewal is annual and not automatic. Both cities, he said, had had results with the system over the past year.[2]
A second motion, to sign the agreement outright rather than conditionally, died for want of a second. The conditional motion carried unanimously.[2]
Note what changed between the pitch and the purchase. The 2023 proposal named four agencies including the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office; the 2024 agreement is a three-way share with the two cities. The minutes do not explain the difference.
What the two products do
Cellebrite’s extraction tools copy the contents of a device. Pathfinder is the analytics layer that links and searches what has been extracted across cases. Guardian is the part that stores and shares evidence between users.
The practical consequence is the one the 2023 pitch named out loud: not just opening a phone, but keeping what comes off it somewhere the participating agencies can cross-check.
What is not on the record
What the cost share agreement says, or what each agency pays. What the archive holds and for how long. Whether a warrant is required before extraction in each agency’s practice, and whether any written policy says so. How many phones have been through it. And whether data taken off a phone seized by one of the three agencies can be searched by the other two.
None of the three publishes a policy on any of it.
What we do not know
- What the cost share agreement says, and what each agency pays.
- What the shared archive holds, how long, and who may search it.
- Whether extraction requires a warrant in each agency's practice, and whether any written policy says so.
- How many devices have been extracted, and in what kinds of case.
- Whether data from a phone seized by one agency is searchable by the other two.
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Canyon County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Canyon County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. Canyon County Board of County Commissioners, business proceedings 2023, Sheriff's Office budget session, project no. 62 · Meeting record · · accessed
- 2. Canyon County Board of County Commissioners, business proceedings 2024, 19 September 2024, agreement no. 24-110 · Meeting record · · accessed
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.