Oregon
Multnomah County
On record
Checked 26 Aug 2026- Technologies
- 2
- Systems
- 2
- Devices mapped
- 217
Multnomah County, Oregon. Device data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), with community reporting via DeFlock. Open the full map →
The first Oregon county researched, and an unusual shape: a complete, readable rulebook with the decisions behind it out of reach.
The Sheriff’s Office publishes its entire agency policy manual, and all of it can be machine-read. One hundred and nineteen documents, not one an image-only scan, every search verified against canary terms. On this project’s evidence that is rare, and it makes the negatives here unusually strong.
The strongest one: no plate reader policy exists anywhere in that manual. Zero references to ALPR under any spelling, with the only “license plate” matches being the plates of the office’s own vehicles. Since 31 March 2026, Oregon’s SB 1516 has required an agency to establish and publish ALPR policies before deploying a system, so a published manual with no such policy is what the statute would predict for an agency with no deployment. That is a statement about the published record, not proof about equipment, and the office’s board record, where a purchase would appear, is the part we cannot read.
What the manual does show: a body-worn camera programme, established by the agency’s own policy reference and governed in public only on the reviewing side; a voluntary private camera registry whose terms are more candid than most, including that a refused footage request may be followed by a warrant; and a military surplus policy that bans weaponized drones and combat aircraft outright and requires a Board resolution, with costs and intended use stated, before any acquisition.
No drone policy exists in the manual either. Two documents brush against the subject: the crowd control policy lists unmanned aerial systems among resources the office and partner agencies may draw on at First Amendment events, and a safety policy references a county administrative procedure for drone worker-safety. Neither establishes that the Sheriff flies aircraft, and the state record that would settle it, the Department of Aviation registry that ORS 837.360 requires every public body to file into, is on our request list.
Why there is no board record here
The Board of County Commissioners’ modern meeting record lives on a Granicus host whose robots file turns away every automated reader, and the county’s own archives stop in 2010. We honor that file while the question of Granicus hosting is unresolved, so the votes behind these policies are documented in a record this site cannot yet check. The military surplus policy makes that record concrete: every surplus acquisition requires a Board resolution, and those resolutions are exactly where we cannot look.
What this county does not cover
Six cities, none researched, and the biggest gap on the page: Portland. The EFF Atlas records the Portland Police Bureau using plate readers since 2008 and both Portland and Gresham holding registered drone fleets. Those are city agencies, documented here only as leads.
Community contributors have mapped 217 devices across the county in OpenStreetMap. That count covers every agency and business at once and is never merged with anything above.
What's in use here
The programme is established by the agency's own published policy, which cites Oregon's body camera statute and an internal body-worn camera procedure. The procedure itself, and every number about the programme, is not published.
A voluntary registry of residents' and businesses' security cameras, run by the Sheriff's Office, with terms that say more than most: you may refuse a footage request, and the office may seek a warrant if you do.
Who runs it
The agency is the accountability unit: who voted, whose policy applies, and who answers a records request.
| Agency | Jurisdiction | Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Multnomah County Sheriff's Office | Multnomah County | 2 |
| 1 agency on record. A jointly run system counts against each of its operators, so this column is not a county total. | ||
Trackers
Meetings, contracts, records
Nothing listed yet. The trackers launch here, and facts appear only with their sources.
How the inventory works →What you can do
Civic action
Show up
Public comment is open to any resident, and you do not have to be an expert to use it. We have not yet confirmed where the bodies that decide for Multnomah County meet. How the inventory works explains what we check and how to check it yourself.
How the inventory works →Personal protection
Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense ↗Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.