Washington Co. Sheriff (OR) | Drones
A published policy that tracks Oregon's drone statute clause by clause: warrants for private spaces, no weapons, no random surveillance, identifiable data capped at 180 days, and an annual report to the state. The fleet size is in a state registry one records request away.
At a glance
- Policy
- WCSO Policy 809, "Deploying Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems", current revision superseding the November 2021 version [1]
- Authorized uses
- Critical incidents, search and rescue, tactical deployment, crash scene diagramming, drug interdictions, each tied to its ORS 837 section [1]
- Flying where privacy is expected
- Requires a warrant, probable cause with exigent circumstances under ORS 837.320, or a declared state of emergency [1]
- Random surveillance
- "The WCSO does not conduct random surveillance activities" [1]
- Weapons
- "The sUAS shall not be equipped with weapons (ORS 837.365)" [1]
- Retention of identifiable data
- Not more than 180 days unless necessary to an authorized mission or otherwise required [1]
- State oversight
- An annual report to the Oregon Department of Aviation per ORS 837.360, filed by the unit commander [1]
- Fleet size
- not stated in the policy. The EFF Atlas records 24 aircraft (BRINC, DJI) registered with the Department of Aviation as of 2024, citing a records-request copy of the state list we could not fetch; the statewide request that would confirm it is drafted [2]
How it happened
- Context
The prior policy revision
The current policy supersedes 809-R02 of this date, so the program predates it. How far back it runs is not stated in anything we read. [1]
- Context
Twenty-four aircraft on the state registry, per the Atlas
The EFF Atlas records 24 active WCSO drones, BRINC and DJI, registered with the Oregon Department of Aviation, citing a public records request whose hosted copy answers a bot challenge to us. The number is a lead, not our finding, until the registry itself is read. [2]
A policy written against the statute
Oregon regulated police drones in 2013, and Washington County’s policy reads like it was drafted with the statute open on the desk. Each authorized use carries its ORS section: search and rescue under ORS 837.335, tactical deployment under ORS 837.340, written-consent flights under ORS 837.330. The privacy rule is the statute’s own:
A sUAS May be Authorized to Fly in Areas Where There is an Expectation of Privacy Pursuant to a Warrant, When There is Probable Cause that a Crime Occurred and Exigent Circumstances Exist Per ORS 837.320, or When the Governor Declares a State of Emergency Per ORS 401.165.
Two flat prohibitions sit alongside it:
The WCSO does not conduct random surveillance activities.
The sUAS shall not be equipped with weapons (ORS 837.365).
And a retention cap most drone policies on this site lack: information containing personally identifiable data “shall not be retained for more than 180 days” unless necessary to an authorized mission or otherwise required to be kept.
The number is in a state registry
What the policy does not say is how many aircraft the office flies. Oregon’s registration statute means somebody does know: every public body must register each drone with the Department of Aviation and report annually on how often and why its aircraft flew, and the policy assigns that filing to the unit commander by name of office.
The EFF Atlas, citing a records-request copy of the state list, puts the fleet at 24 aircraft from BRINC and DJI as of late 2024, which would make it one of the larger public fleets in Oregon. The hosted copy of that list answers a bot challenge to us, so the number stays a lead on this page. One records request to one state agency returns the registry for every public body in Oregon at once, and it is drafted in this county’s queue.
What we do not know
- The fleet: how many aircraft, which models, acquired when and at what cost. The ORS 837.360 registry holds the count and the statewide records request is drafted.
- What the annual reports to the Department of Aviation say about frequency and purposes of use.
- Whether the published data policies ORS 837.362 requires are this policy or a separate document.
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have not yet confirmed where each of them meets in Washington County.
What we have documented in Washington County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. Washington County Sheriff's Office, Policy 809, "Deploying Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems" · Primary document · accessed
- 2.
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.