Skip to content
ORWELL INDEX
Active Updated

LA County Sheriff | Drones

A hundred and seventy-seven aircraft, itemised down to the unit price in the report state law requires. Twenty of them come from the same company that sells plate readers. The report also says the Department cannot yet say how any of them were used.

At a glance

Unmanned aircraft held
177, across 25 line items, as of 20 February 2026 [1]
Largest single holdings
20 Flock Safety Alpha at $8,000 each, 20 Skydio X-10 and 20 Skydio R-10 at $3,500 each, 20 DJI Avata 2 at $1,000 each [1]
Unmanned ground vehicles
14, across 10 line items, including a Boston Dynamics Spot at $8,000 [1]
Deployments, October to December 2025
34 [3]
Policy
MPP 5-09/570.00 and following. Special Enforcement Bureau is the only unit that may authorise a flight [2]
What flights are allowed for
Emergency and life-threatening situations: search and rescue, explosive ordnance, disaster response, barricaded suspects, hostages, active shooters, hazardous materials, fires and other high-risk tactical operations [2]
Armed aircraft
Prohibited. The policy states the aircraft are not armed with any munitions [2]
Non-emergency surveillance
Prohibited by the policy [2]
What each flight was for
not published in usable form. The Inspector General has asked repeatedly for more than the category "high risk tactical operation" [3]
Departmentwide usage data
the 2025 annual report states that comprehensive usage data is not yet available because the tracking system is not fully implemented [1]
When and how the Flock Safety aircraft were acquired
not stated in any document read [1]

How it happened

  1. Deployment

    Thirty-four flights in a quarter, and one recurring objection

    The Inspector General reports 34 deployments from the Department's own published data, and repeats a recommendation it has made before: that the Department say more than "high risk tactical operation" about why an aircraft flew. It notes that the Fourth Amendment has no such exception. [3]

  2. Procurement

    The inventory, with quantities and unit costs

    The Department's 2025 military equipment report lists its holdings as of this date: 177 unmanned aircraft across 25 line items and 14 unmanned or remotely operated ground vehicles across 10. Twenty of the aircraft are Flock Safety Alpha at $8,000 each. Several aerial rows carry a requisition note about maintaining an inventory of 100. [1]

  3. Context

    The report says its own usage data is not ready

    The Military Equipment Management System, which is to centralise tracking of acquisition, deployment, maintenance and inventory, has been built and is operational, but administrative steps remain. The report states that comprehensive usage data is not yet available for this reporting period and expects it in future ones. [1]

The rare thing here is the arithmetic

Most agencies on this site publish a drone policy and nothing that establishes they own a drone. California’s AB 481 was written to close exactly that gap: an agency holding covered equipment must publish an annual report listing what it has, how many, what each cost, and how they were used.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department publishes one, and the inventory is itemised. Counting the unmanned aerial rows in the 2025 report gives 177 aircraft across 25 line items, held as of 20 February 2026. Twenty Skydio X-10 and twenty Skydio R-10, the latter built for indoors and tight spaces. Twenty DJI Avata 2 at a thousand dollars each. Two tethered Fotokite Sigma with infrared and thermal cameras. A DJI M30T with thermal imaging and a laser rangefinder. Several rows carry a requisition note about maintaining an inventory of one hundred.

The ground fleet is smaller and stranger: fourteen units, including a Boston Dynamics Spot at eight thousand dollars, two Transcend Vantage that can deliver chemical agents, one that breaches doors, and two bomb squad robots at three hundred and twenty-three thousand dollars each.

Twenty of the aircraft come from the plate reader company

The largest single aerial line item is twenty Flock Safety Alpha at eight thousand dollars each.

Flock Safety is the company most often named on this site for fixed plate reader cameras. Its drone product is a different thing, marketed for responding to calls before officers arrive. Nothing in the documents read for this page records when these were bought, under what contract, or whether the two systems touch each other in any way. The Sheriff’s plate reader policy names no vendor at all.

What the inventory does establish is that a single company now supplies this department both a county-wide network of cameras that watch the roads and a fleet of aircraft that can be sent to a location. Those are separate capabilities in separate policies. They are not separate purchases from separate suppliers.

What the rules say, and what the oversight says

The policy is narrow on its face. Only the Special Enforcement Bureau may authorise a flight. Flights are limited to emergencies: search and rescue, explosive ordnance, disaster response, barricaded suspects, hostages, active shooters, hazardous materials, fires, and high-risk tactical operations. The aircraft are not armed. Non-emergency surveillance is prohibited, as is any mission that would violate the public’s privacy rights.

The county’s Inspector General has a standing objection to the last item on that list. Reporting 34 deployments between October and December 2025, it wrote that it continues to recommend the Department say more about what a “high risk tactical operation” is, and set out why:

The law recognizes these reasons for conducting a search as legal under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which does not have an exception for a warrantless search based on a “high risk tactical operation.”

That is an oversight body telling its own sheriff that a category in the policy is doing work the Constitution does not recognise. It is the sharpest sentence any county official has written in the material this project has read.

The gap the report names itself

AB 481 asks for usage, not just inventory. The 2025 report explains that the system meant to collect it, the Military Equipment Management System, has been built and is running but is not fully rolled out, and that:

As a result, further comprehensive usage data is not yet available for inclusion in this reporting period.

So the county knows what it owns, to the dollar, and does not yet have a departmentwide account of what it did with it. The quarterly count of drone flights comes from the Inspector General reading a dashboard, not from the statutory report.

Both halves of that are worth holding at once. An agency that publishes an itemised inventory and then states plainly which part of its own reporting is not ready is doing more than most. And the part that is not ready is the part that would tell a resident whether an aircraft has ever been over their street.

What we do not know

What you can do

Show up

Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have not yet confirmed where each of them meets in Los Angeles County.

What we have documented in Los Angeles County →

Protect yourself

Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.

Surveillance Self-Defense →

Sources

  1. 1.
    Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report (Government Code section 7070 et seq.), published 14 July 2026, inventory as of 20 February 2026 · Primary document · · accessed
  2. 2.
    Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Manual of Policy and Procedures 5-09/570.00, "Unmanned Aircraft System" · Primary document · accessed
  3. 3.
    Los Angeles County Office of Inspector General, "Reform and Oversight Efforts: Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, January through March 2026" · Primary document · accessed
  4. 4.
    Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, AB 481 military equipment transparency page · Primary document · accessed

Get the digest

A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.

Subscribe to the newsletter

One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.