Blackfoot Police | The Blackfoot Police Department's cameras
Every officer wears one and every patrol car has one, and the footage sits on a server the city shares with the county. The Council learned all of that from a budget slide about storage costs.
At a glance
- Who runs it
- Blackfoot Police Department [1]
- How many cameras
- One per officer and one per patrol car [1]
- How much footage
- About six hours per officer per day [1]
- Where it is stored
- On a server the city shares with the county [1]
- Vendor
- Not named in the city's published record for the cameras. The department's Tasers are Axon and its radios Motorola, and the 2024 year in review names Cellebrite for phone extraction [1] [2]
- How long recordings are kept
- Not stated in any published city document [4]
- A published policy
- We could not find a body camera or in-car camera policy on the city's website or in its published record [4]
How it happened
- Context
The Council hears what it already owns
At a special Council meeting on the city's five and ten year plans, the Chief of Police explained that every officer had a body camera and every patrol car a camera, that storage had become the major issue, that each officer produced about six hours of footage a day, and that the footage sat on a server the city owns jointly with the county. He expected to have to move to cloud storage in 2023 or 2024. [1]
- Deployment
Cameras in three parks facilities
The city's year in review for 2023 records a new camera system installed at Jensen Grove, the Parks and Recreation shop and the golf course, to help deal with vandalism. [3]
- Procurement
Cellebrite, with the Sheriff's Office
The police department's year in review lists, among the year's equipment changes, a transition to Cellebrite software carried out in collaboration with the Sheriff's Office, to retrieve digital evidence, alongside replacing Taser X2 devices with Taser 7 models and moving to new Motorola handheld radios. [2]
The Blackfoot Police Department did not ask its City Council for permission to record. By the time the Council was told in any detail what the department had, it already had all of it.
The occasion was a special meeting on 17 March 2022 about the city’s five and ten year plans. The Chief of Police went through vehicle leases, the rising price of bulletproof vests, hard body armor partly reimbursed by the federal government, and fuel. Then this:
Chief Gay explained the police department is at a point where every officer has a body camera, and every police vehicle is equipped with a camera, however, storage of camera recording footage is what has become the major issue.
He told the Council that on average each officer produces about six hours per day, that the department would likely need to switch to cloud based storage in 2023 or 2024, and that “Currently the city’s police department shares a server with the county’s police department that is owned and not leased.”[1]
What that item actually was
It was a slide about a storage bill. Every fact a resident might want about the department’s recording, that it is total, that it runs to hours per officer per shift, and that the footage is held on hardware shared with another agency, arrived because someone had to explain why the line item was going to grow.
The shared server is the part worth sitting with. Two separate agencies, a city police department and a county sheriff’s office, holding each other’s video on one machine that the record says the city and county own between them. Nothing in either body’s published record says who administers it, who can see what, or whether either agency logs a search of the other’s footage.
Three years later the same closeness shows up in software. The department’s 2024 year in review, read to the Council in February 2025, lists “in collaboration with the Sheriff’s Office transitioning to Cellebrite software to enhance the ability to effectively investigate crimes and retrieve digital evidence”, in a sentence that also covers new Tasers and new radios.[2] Cellebrite extracts the contents of a phone. The Council was told about it in the same breath as the radios, and no contract, price or policy for it appears in the city’s record.
The parks
The city also records places. Its year in review for 2023 records that it “Installed a new camera system at Jensen Grove, Parks/Rec Shop, and the Golf Course to help deal with vandalism.”[3] Jensen Grove is the city’s lake and park, the place people go in summer. No price, vendor, camera count or retention period appears anywhere, and the record does not say whether the police department can watch the feed.
What we do not know
How long the department keeps body camera footage. Whether it moved to cloud storage and to whose. What agreement, if any, governs the shared server. Whether there is a written body camera policy, and whether the Council has ever seen it. None of those has an answer in the city’s published record.
If you want an answer
The Blackfoot City Council meets at 7:00 PM on the first Tuesday of the month in the Council Chambers at 157 North Broadway. The police budget presentation, usually in the spring, and the department’s year in review, usually in February, are the two meetings a year where this equipment is described out loud.
A public records request to the City of Blackfoot under the Idaho Public Records Act can ask for the department’s body camera policy, its retention schedule, and any agreement with Bingham County covering the shared storage.
What we do not know
- How long does the department keep body camera and in-car footage?
- What governs the shared server, and can county staff see city footage or the other way round?
- Did the department move to cloud storage, and if so to whose cloud?
- Is there a written body camera policy, and has the Council ever seen it?
- Who watches the park cameras, and how long is that footage kept?
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Bingham County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Bingham County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. City of Blackfoot, special City Council meeting minutes, 17 March 2022 · Meeting record · · accessed
- 2. City of Blackfoot, City Council minutes, 4 February 2025, police department year in review · Meeting record · · accessed
- 3. City of Blackfoot, City Council minutes, 6 February 2024, city year in review · Meeting record · · accessed
- 4. City of Blackfoot, Agenda Center, all categories, 2018 to September 2026 · Meeting record · · accessed
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.