Skip to content
ORWELL INDEX
Active Updated

St. Anthony Police | St. Anthony's plate readers

Six license plate readers stand in St. Anthony. The whole published record of how the city bought them is a seven word agenda line, one sentence of minutes and a vote of four to nothing.

At a glance

How many
Six, as mapped by volunteers [5]
Who approved it
The City Council, four votes to nothing [1] [2]
What the agenda called it
"Open Budget for Safety Cameras" [1]
Price
No amount appears in the agenda, the minutes, the resolutions book, the public notices book or the municipal code. The motion opened a budget without naming a figure [1] [2]
Vendor named in the decision
None. The word Flock first appears in the Council's record on 25 June 2026, eight months after the vote, in a department report [2] [3]
A published policy
We could not find an automated license plate reader policy published by the City of St. Anthony on any host we reached, including the city website and all five of its published books [3]
How long the reads are kept
Not published. On 13 August 2026 the Chief told the Council the department planned to change the retention and that the contract was probably changing too. Idaho's plate reader statute sets no retention limit [4] [6]

How it happened

  1. Decision

    The Council opens a budget for "Safety Cameras"

    Among nine items of general business, between surplusing two speed trailers and confirming an airport manager, the agenda carries "Open Budget for Safety Cameras – Action Item". The minutes record the whole of it: a motion to open the budget to purchase security cameras, made by Council Member Nichols and seconded by Council Member VanderLinden, passing four votes to nothing. No vendor, no amount, no camera count, no location, and no mention of license plates. [1] [2]

  2. Deployment

    Moving forward

    Two weeks later the Chief's department report records that the department is moving forward with the security cameras. There is no further action item. [7]

  3. Deployment

    The word Flock reaches the record

    Eight months after the vote, the Chief asks the Council whether it has any questions about the Flock cameras, gives the Council a message he plans to provide to residents, says he audits the use of the system and that the department is following Idaho Code, and reports that the cameras recently helped solve a hit and run in town. This is the only occurrence of the word Flock in the Council's entire published record. [3]

  4. Debate

    The contract and the retention are changing

    The Chief reports on the camera system: it is probable the contract is going to change, and the department plans on changing the retention data. No figure is given for either, and no action item follows. [4]

A license plate reader is a camera that photographs every vehicle that passes it, reads the plate, and files the plate number with the time and the place. It does this to everyone, not to suspects. Six of them stand in St. Anthony, a city of about three and a half thousand people.

Here is everything the City Council was asked, and everything it said.

The item

On the agenda for 9 October 2025, between surplusing two speed trailers and confirming the appointment of an airport manager, is the line “Open Budget for Safety Cameras – Action Item”.[1] That is the whole of the public notice.

The minutes of that meeting record the whole of the decision in one sentence: a motion to open the budget to purchase security cameras, made by one council member and seconded by another, on which all council members present were in favor, passing four votes to nothing.[2]

No vendor is named. No amount is named. No number of cameras is named, and no location. The words license plate do not appear, and neither does the word Flock.

Two weeks later the Chief told the Council the department was moving forward with the security cameras.[7] Nothing else was voted on.

Eight months later

The word Flock reaches the Council’s record on 25 June 2026, in a department report. The Chief asked whether the Council had any questions about the Flock cameras, gave the members a message he planned to provide to residents, said that he audits the use of the system and that the department is following Idaho Code, and reported that the cameras had recently helped solve a hit and run in town.[3]

That is the only time the word Flock appears anywhere in the City Council’s published record. We searched all five of the city’s published books, about 5.9 million characters of minutes, agendas, resolutions, public notices and the municipal code, with a full text search checked against terms we knew were present. One hit.

The message to residents is not in the minutes and was not published in the city’s notices.

What Idaho law asks of the system

Idaho has governed plate readers by statute since 1 July 2025, three months before this vote.[6] Section 49-1432 of the Idaho Code lets an agency use a reader for law enforcement or traffic flow analysis, and where it is used for law enforcement it limits the device and its data to the investigation of felony or misdemeanor crimes or traffic accidents, or to searching for missing or endangered persons. It bars using them to enforce traffic infractions unless an accident is involved.

It also asks for record keeping. Access must be limited to authorized personnel with access controls. Every authorized user must have mandatory training in data privacy, legal compliance and ethical use. Every access and every query must be logged with the user’s identity, the date, the time and the purpose. And the agency must audit those logs twice a year.

The statute says nothing at all about how long the reads may be kept.

That absence matters here, because on 13 August 2026 the Chief told the Council that it was probable the contract was going to change and that the department planned on changing the retention data.[4] Neither the retention period the city has now nor the one it is moving to appears in any record we could find.

What this page cannot tell you

We can tell you that six readers are there, that the Council opened a budget for them in one sentence, and that the department says it audits them. We cannot tell you the price, the term, the vendor’s name from any document the city produced, the camera count from the city itself, where the cameras stand, or who else can search what they collect. None of that is published.

Those are the questions in the records request this project has drafted, and they are questions a resident can also ask in person. Public comment is a standing item on every St. Anthony City Council agenda, near the top of the meeting, and you do not have to be on the agenda to use it.

What we do not know

What you can do

Show up

Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Fremont County and how public comment works there.

How to show up in Fremont County →

Protect yourself

Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.

Surveillance Self-Defense →

Sources

  1. 1.
    St. Anthony City Council agenda, 9 October 2025, Open Budget for Safety Cameras · Meeting record · · accessed
  2. 2.
    St. Anthony City Council minutes, 9 October 2025, Open Budget for Safety Cameras · Meeting record · · accessed
  3. 3.
    St. Anthony City Council minutes, 25 June 2026, department report on the Flock cameras · Meeting record · · accessed
  4. 4.
    St. Anthony City Council minutes, 13 August 2026, department report on the camera system · Meeting record · · accessed
  5. 5.
    OpenStreetMap contributors, surveillance devices mapped in Fremont County, Idaho · Dataset · · accessed
  6. 6.
    Idaho Senate Bill 1180 (2025), enrolled, adding Idaho Code 49-1432 · Law · · accessed
  7. 7.
    St. Anthony City Council minutes, 23 October 2025, department report · Meeting record · · accessed

Get the digest

A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.

Subscribe to the newsletter

One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.