St. Anthony Police and Fremont County Sheriff | St. Anthony's body and in-car cameras
The city's five year camera contract was read to the Council in a department report and never voted on. Its first body cameras came from a federal grant the county signed for it.
At a glance
- Vendor
- LensLock [1]
- Price
- $18,000 the first year, $15,000 for each of four more [1]
- Who approved it
- No motion, no second and no vote appear. The item sits under DEPARTMENT REPORTS, after the Council had finished its general business [1]
- Where the recordings go
- The vendor's cloud [1]
- In service since
- November 2024 for the body cameras, December 2024 for the car cameras [2]
- How long recordings are kept
- Not stated in any city record we read [1]
How it happened
- Decision
The county buys the city's first body cameras
The Board of County Commissioners signs the 2015 State Homeland Security Program Grant, $28,756.83, which the county's emergency management coordinator will use to buy body cameras for the officers of the City of St. Anthony and a generator for the fire station in Ashton. The motion passes unanimously. The purchase is a county act for a city department. [3]
- Decision
Six more, again on federal money
The Chief tells the Council he has been working with the county emergency management official on a grant for body cameras, that the department will receive six new ones, and that the funding is coming from the Department of Homeland Security. Two weeks later he reports taking possession of six WatchGuard cameras to replace failing ones, saving the city about $7,300. [4] [5]
- Decision
A five year price, in a department report
The Chief reports that the cameras in the cars are no longer supported, that an incident left a body camera stamping footage 2014 which he then had to explain in court, and that the maker had been bought out by Motorola. The department has picked LensLock, which gave the best price and offers cloud storage the city attorney can reach, record storage and a redaction policy. The price is $18,000 in the first year and $15,000 in each of the next four. The item is a report. No motion is made and no vote is taken. [1]
- Deployment
In the field
The department receives the new body cameras and car cameras. The body cameras are up and running; the car cameras are scheduled for installation on 16 and 17 December. A month later the City Clerk tells the Council the office has moved to fibre because the new camera system is already up and the cameras take a significant amount of bandwidth. [2] [6]
Body cameras are the surveillance technology with the best public case. They record the officer as well as the person stopped, and departments and civil liberties groups have both argued for them. What is worth watching in St. Anthony is not whether the cameras exist but how the city decided to pay for five years of them.
Bought on report, not on motion
On 10 October 2024 the Chief told the Council the cameras in the patrol cars were no longer supported. He described an incident where a body camera had stamped a recording 2014, which he then had to explain in court. The maker had been bought out by Motorola, and he had met with Motorola and with another company.
The department had picked LensLock. They gave the best price, recordings would download to a cloud the city attorney could reach, the company would store the records and offered a redaction policy, and the pricing would be $18,000 in the first year and $15,000 in each of the four years after.[1]
That paragraph sits under DEPARTMENT REPORTS, after the Council had finished its general business and approved its invoices. There is no motion, no second and no vote anywhere in the minutes of that meeting or afterwards.
The cameras arrived the next month and the car cameras were fitted in December.[2] By then the city had moved its office onto a fibre connection, because, as the Clerk told the Council, the new camera system was already up and the cameras took a significant amount of bandwidth.[6]
The county bought the first ones
St. Anthony’s first body cameras did not come out of a city budget at all.
In September 2015 the Board of County Commissioners signed the 2015 State Homeland Security Program Grant for $28,756.83. The minutes describe what the county’s emergency management coordinator would do with it: buy body cameras for the officers in the City of St. Anthony, and a generator for the fire station in Ashton. The motion passed unanimously.[3]
Four years later the same coordinator did it again. In October 2019 the Chief told the Council he had been working with the county emergency management official on a grant for body cameras, that six new ones were coming, and that the money was from the Department of Homeland Security.[4] Two weeks later he reported taking possession of six WatchGuard cameras, which he said saved the city about $7,300.[5]
This is worth noticing on its own. A city police department’s recording equipment was bought twice by a county officer, on federal grants, through a body no St. Anthony voter elects. The decisions appear in the county’s minutes as grant acceptances, which is not where anyone looking for a camera purchase would think to look.
What we do not know
- Is there a signed LensLock contract, and does its term match the five years the Chief described?
- How long is body and in-car footage kept, and who inside the department can view or export it?
- What does the redaction policy say, and who decides what is redacted before a release?
- Did the Council ever vote on this purchase in a meeting we have not read?
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Fremont County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Fremont County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. St. Anthony City Council minutes, 10 October 2024, department report on the camera system · Meeting record · · accessed
- 2. St. Anthony City Council minutes, 14 November 2024, new body and car cameras received · Meeting record · · accessed
- 3. Fremont County Board of County Commissioners minutes, 8 September 2015, 2015 State Homeland Security Program Grant · Meeting record · · accessed
- 4. St. Anthony City Council minutes, 10 October 2019, grant for body cameras · Meeting record · · accessed
- 5. St. Anthony City Council minutes, 24 October 2019, six Watch Guard body cameras received · Meeting record · · accessed
- 6. St. Anthony City Council minutes, 12 December 2024, the camera system and the fibre connection · Meeting record · · accessed
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.