Post Falls Police | Camera registry
A place for residents to register their own security cameras with the police, bought inside a five year renewal of the department's records system. The staff report names the records system. It does not name the registry.
At a glance
- What it is
- Camera Registration in Motorola CommandCentral Community [1]
- Price
- $445,725 for the package it came in [2]
- Who paid
- $282,181.88 federal, $163,543.12 from 911 fees [2]
- Who approved it
- Post Falls City Council, five votes to nothing [4]
- How many cameras are registered
- Not stated in any city record we read [2]
How it happened
- Procurement
Five years of a records system, and a camera registry inside it
The City Council approves a five year agreement with Motorola Solutions for continued service of the Spillman computer aided dispatch and records management system, five votes to nothing. A captain presents it: the department "has been using the Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System (Spillman) for over two decades. This agreement is for the next 5 years of service and upgrades with Motorola Solutions who purchased Spillman several years ago." $282,181.88 comes from previously approved federal funding and $163,543.12 from 911 fees. The Motorola proposal printed in the same packet lists CommandCentral Community with 74 licenses, CommandCentral Investigate and a Compstat dashboard among the products bought. [2] [4]
- Context
What the packet says the registry does
The proposal's own description, forty pages into the packet: "Camera Registration allows citizens to register their residential or commercial security cameras in CityProtect. Each community member can create a free CityProtect user account to manage their camera information. Your agency can then access the location of these cameras and contact the owner for potential video evidence." The same section describes a public crime map that "automatically publishes crime data and incident information from your RMS or CAD system" and public tip forms. [1]
On 19 September 2023 the Post Falls City Council spent $445,725 on five more years of the software that runs its dispatch and records. It took four sentences, a motion and five ayes.[4]
The staff report says what a staff report should. The department “has been using the Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System (Spillman) for over two decades. This agreement is for the next 5 years of service and upgrades with Motorola Solutions who purchased Spillman several years ago.” $282,181.88 from previously approved federal funding, under an American Rescue Plan Act project code, and $163,543.12 from 911 fees.[2]
The proposal attached to it runs to fifty pages, and about forty pages in it stops describing a records system and starts describing something else.
“Camera Registration allows citizens to register their residential or commercial security cameras in CityProtect. Each community member can create a free CityProtect user account to manage their camera information. Your agency can then access the location of these cameras and contact the owner for potential video evidence.”[1]
The line item is “CommandCentral Community - SSV00S02400A – 74 Licenses”.[1] The same platform carries a public crime map that “automatically publishes crime data and incident information from your RMS or CAD system”, anonymous tip forms and digital evidence submission.[1]
Why this is worth noticing
A camera registry is not a camera. Nobody is compelled to join one, the footage stays on the owner’s own recorder until they hand it over, and a department that knows which houses on a street have a doorbell camera can find a hit and run faster than one that has to knock on every door.
What it does is change the shape of the city’s camera network. A few hundred private cameras with nothing connecting them are a few hundred private cameras. The same cameras with their locations in one searchable map, held by the agency, are the beginnings of an inventory: not a system anyone built, but one that can be queried like a system. The line between the two is a database, and the database arrived here as a line item in a records management renewal.
None of that is hidden. The proposal is in the packet, the packet is published, and the description quoted above is the vendor’s own. But the item on the agenda was titled for the dispatch system, the presentation to the Council was about the dispatch system, and the minutes record nothing else.[4] A resident who wanted to argue about a camera registry would have had to read forty pages into an attachment to find out there was one to argue about.
What we do not know
- How many cameras have been registered, and where? No city record we read gives a number.
- What happens to a registered camera's location data, and how long is it kept? The proposal describes the feature and not its retention.
- Is the registry switched on? The proposal is a menu of CommandCentral Community features and the City bought 74 licenses; no later city document says which of them the department turned on.
- The EFF Atlas of Surveillance records a CityProtect camera registry at the Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, citing the vendor's own agency page. Is that a second registry, or the same platform reaching across agencies?
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Kootenai County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Kootenai County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. Motorola Solutions proposal, Post Falls Police Department, 27 July 2023, printed in the City Council packet of 19 September 2023 · Primary document · · accessed
- 2. Post Falls City Council agenda packet, 19 September 2023, carrying the staff report and the proposal · Primary document · · accessed
- 3. Post Falls City Council agenda packet, 1 September 2026, carrying the police ALPR staff report and slides · Primary document · · accessed
- 4. Post Falls City Council minutes, 19 September 2023, printed in the 3 October 2023 packet · Meeting record · · accessed
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.