Lyon County Sheriff | Flock plate readers
The board approved a two-year Flock contract in November 2023 and asked good questions before it did: how long is the data kept, who can see it, why this vendor. It got answers on the record. The contract's two years have since run out, and nothing we can read says what happened next.
At a glance
- What the board approved
- A two-year contract with Flock Group Inc. for $39,500, first year $24,500 from a General Fund contingency transfer, on 2 November 2023, passed 4-0 [1]
- What the county said it buys
- "a camera system and software that identifies vehicles and license plates for public safety", in the agenda summary sheet [1]
- Retention, as stated to the board
- One year, then eliminated from the vendor's system, stated by a Sheriff's Office lieutenant answering commissioners' questions [1]
- Who can see it, as stated to the board
- Deputies and law enforcement, with neighbouring counties on the same system [1]
- Whether it is still operating
- the contract ran two years from November 2023. We found no renewal, no expiry and no decision to stop in the board's agendas or minutes through September 2026 [2]
- Camera count and locations
- not stated in the agenda item, the summary sheet or the minutes. A lieutenant told the board there was a basis for deciding where to place them; the basis is not recorded [1]
- Written usage policy
- none found. Nevada has no plate reader statute, so no state law requires one to exist [2]
How it happened
- Decision
Approved 4-0, with the right questions asked
The Board of County Commissioners approved a two-year contract with Flock Group Inc. for $39,500. The minutes record that commissioners "stated their concerns with data retention and elimination, who has access to that data, and why Flock was chosen and as well as how was it determined where to utilize Flock." A lieutenant answered that retention is one year, that deputies and law enforcement have access, and that a benefit is "Lyon County and neighboring counties utilizing the same system to work together." There was no public comment. [1]
- Context
A resident objects, and the record has gone quiet
Written comment to the county clerk opposes "all data centers and flock cameras for that matter". It is the only mention of the system in the board's record after 2023, and it is a resident's belief rather than a county statement. The contract's two years had run out by then. [2]
The board asked, and got answers
Lyon County’s plate reader purchase is unusual in this project for a simple reason. The commissioners asked the questions a resident would want asked, and they asked them before voting.
The minutes record that commissioners “stated their concerns with data retention and elimination, who has access to that data, and why Flock was chosen and as well as how was it determined where to utilize Flock.” A Sheriff’s Office lieutenant answered on the record: retention is one year and the data is then eliminated from the vendor’s system, deputies and law enforcement have access, and one benefit is “Lyon County and neighboring counties utilizing the same system to work together.”
Most plate reader approvals this project has read contain nothing like that. This one is a small piece of evidence that the questions are answerable when a board asks them out loud.
The reason given was partly that the neighbours have it
That last answer is the one with the longest reach. Part of the case for the system was interoperability with adjacent counties.
The same argument appears one county away. Storey County’s Sheriff writes in his own annual report that his office “played a major role in assisting other regional Law enforcement agencies obtain this same technology.” Read together, the two records describe a regional plate reader network assembled one county at a time, where each board votes only on its own piece and no board ever votes on the network.
Then the record stops
The contract was for two years. Two years from November 2023 ends around November 2025. We read the board’s agendas and minutes through September 2026 and found no renewal, no expiry, and no decision to stop.
That is not a finding that the cameras are gone, and it is not a finding that they are running. It is a gap. A resident wrote to the county clerk in September 2026 opposing “flock cameras,” which suggests residents believe the cameras are still there, but a resident’s belief is not a record.
Whether these cameras are switched on today, and under what terms, is the first question on this county’s records request.
On the map
The community has mapped 11 devices of this type in the county on OpenStreetMap. These are community reports: the vendor and operator of each point are unverified, and none is confirmed to belong to this system. See them on the map →
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
- Location road not yet identified license plate reader ↗
Street names from reverse geocoding — © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
What we do not know
- Whether the cameras are still operating. The two-year contract ran out around November 2025 and the board's record shows no renewal, no expiry and no decision to stop.
- How many cameras there are and where they stand, neither of which the approval record states.
- Whether the one-year retention stated to the board is the configured retention, and whether any audit of searches has ever been run.
- Which agencies outside Lyon County can query this data. The stated rationale was that neighbouring counties run the same system, which describes a regional network whose membership is not on the record.
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Lyon County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Lyon County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1.
- 2.
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.