Lane County Sheriff | Drones
A drone policy that tracks Oregon's statute, requires any agency borrowing the data to have safeguards at least as protective, and is published with redactions the Sheriff's own index announces.
At a glance
- Policy
- General Order 10.01, "Small Unmanned Aerial Systems / Drone", revised 4 April 2022, published in redacted form [1]
- The redaction, in the office’s own words
- "(Redacted to Protect Operational Information)", on the general orders index itself [2]
- Governing statute
- ORS 837.300 and following, cited section by section in the order’s header [1]
- Privacy rule
- Operators "shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy", including deactivating imaging [1]
- Emergency use
- Requires a sworn statement to the circuit court describing the emergency; use under a Governor-declared emergency is limited to the proclamation's geography [1]
- Sharing the data
- Only with an agency whose safeguards are "at least as protective as LCSO's policies" [1]
- Fleet size
- not stated in the published order. The EFF Atlas records 7 DJI aircraft registered with the Oregon Department of Aviation as of 2024, via a records-request copy we cannot fetch [3]
How it happened
- Decision
The current revision, published redacted
The order tracks ORS 837 from definitions through the warrant section. The published file carries redactions, and the Sheriff's own index labels the entry "Redacted to Protect Operational Information". What is redacted is not known; the records request asks for the order or an index of the exemptions claimed. [1] [2]
- Context
Seven aircraft on the state registry, per the Atlas
The EFF Atlas records 7 active DJI drones registered with the Oregon Department of Aviation, citing a public records copy hosted behind a bot challenge. A lead until the registry itself is read; the statewide request is drafted. [3]
Published, and partly withheld, in the same file
Lane County publishes its drone policy, which most Oregon agencies researched so far also do. What is unusual is the candour about what it does not publish: the general orders index labels the entry itself “Redacted to Protect Operational Information”, and the filename says the same.
The visible text is a serious policy. It cites ORS 837 section by section, from the definitions through the warrant requirement. Operators must take “reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy”, including turning imaging off. Emergency use without a warrant requires a sworn statement to the circuit court. Use during a declared emergency is confined to the geography of the Governor’s proclamation. And the data-sharing rule exports the policy with the data:
policies and procedures in place that provide safeguards to public privacy and rights at least as protective as LCSO’s policies.
What the redaction leaves open
We do not know what was removed, and we do not speculate. A redacted publication is more than many agencies provide and less than the statute’s transparency provisions contemplate, and the honest next step is the one in this county’s records request: the unredacted order, or an index of the redactions and the exemption claimed for each. The fleet itself is one statewide records request away, in the Department of Aviation registry every Oregon public body must file into.
What we do not know
- What the redactions cover. The office says operational information; the request asks.
- The fleet, its costs, and the ORS 837.360 annual reports.
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have not yet confirmed where each of them meets in Lane County.
What we have documented in Lane County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1.
- 2. Lane County Sheriff's Office, general orders index page · Primary document · accessed
- 3.
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.