Oregon
Lane County
On record
Checked 26 Aug 2026- Technologies
- 3
- Systems
- 3
- Devices mapped
- 216
Lane County, Oregon. Device data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), with community reporting via DeFlock. Open the full map →
The first Oregon county researched whose entire record sits on its own government website. The Sheriff publishes all 214 of its general orders there, the Board publishes its own compiled agendas, and nothing stands behind a vendor’s robots file. Everything readable was read: two million characters, one dead link, one deliberate redaction.
The rules are current where it counts. The body camera order, revised in May 2024, bars facial recognition and biometric matching on the footage, and its vendor clause says something most policies never think to say: any storage contract must state the recordings belong to the Sheriff’s Office, not the vendor. The drone order tracks Oregon’s statute section by section and is published in redacted form, which the Sheriff’s own index announces rather than hides.
The plate readers are reported and invisible at once. The press reported the office purchasing 22 Flock Safety cameras in late 2025, awaiting deployment plans. No general order governs them, and no board agenda title in 2024, 2025 or 2026 names them, which means the purchase was not a named agenda item in the year it reportedly happened. The agenda compilations are titles only, so a consent packet or a below-threshold procurement would not show. Oregon’s SB 1516 has required policies to be published before deployment since March 2026, so cameras still in storage need no published policy yet, and cameras in service would. Which of those is true, where the purchase was approved, and what the contract says are the first questions on this county’s records request.
What this county does not cover
The cities: Eugene, whose police department the EFF Atlas records with body cameras and six registered drones; Springfield; Florence, which the Atlas gives its own Flock cameras; and the rest. The University of Oregon’s police department and the Coos Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Tribal Police Department appear in the Atlas here too, the second tribal agency it places in an Oregon county, and the county model of this site cannot yet hold either.
Community contributors have mapped 216 devices across the county in OpenStreetMap. That count covers every agency and business at once and is never merged with anything above.
What's in use here
A drone policy that tracks Oregon's statute, requires any agency borrowing the data to have safeguards at least as protective, and is published with redactions the Sheriff's own index announces.
The press reported 22 Flock cameras purchased in late 2025, awaiting deployment plans. The Sheriff's complete published rulebook and three years of the Board's own agenda titles contain no trace of them.
A 2024 policy that bars facial recognition on the footage and puts one sentence in every storage contract most agencies never think to write: the recordings belong to the county, not the vendor.
Who runs it
The agency is the accountability unit: who voted, whose policy applies, and who answers a records request.
| Agency | Jurisdiction | Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Lane County Sheriff's Office | Lane County | 3 |
| 1 agency on record. A jointly run system counts against each of its operators, so this column is not a county total. | ||
Trackers
Meetings, contracts, records
Nothing listed yet. The trackers launch here, and facts appear only with their sources.
How the inventory works →What you can do
Civic action
Show up
Public comment is open to any resident, and you do not have to be an expert to use it. We have not yet confirmed where the bodies that decide for Lane County meet. How the inventory works explains what we check and how to check it yourself.
How the inventory works →Personal protection
Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense ↗Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.