Skip to content
ORWELL INDEX

Oregon

Lincoln County

On record

Checked 26 Aug 2026
Technologies
0
Systems
0
Devices mapped
26

Lincoln County, Oregon. Device data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), with community reporting via DeFlock. Open the full map →

The Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office publishes one of the more detailed plate reader policies in Oregon. Whether it operates any plate readers is a separate question, and this page cannot answer it.

Policy 436 of the office’s manual covers administration, permitted use, hot lists, a search entry log, retention, accountability and data sharing limits. It is written to Oregon’s Senate Bill 1516 and cites the statute by section. On retention:

“All ALPR data downloaded to the server should be stored for no more than 30 days after the ALPR data is collected unless it has become, or it is reasonable to believe it will become, evidence in a criminal or civil action, or is subject to a lawful action to produce records.”

And a public facing duty that residents can hold the office to:

“Vendor audits shall be published on the office website within two days of receipt, if the vendor does not provide direct public access to the results of the audit within two days of completion”

That is a specific, checkable obligation. On the Sheriff’s Office page we read, there is no vendor audit and no mention of plate readers at all. That is one page rather than the whole site, so we are not claiming the office is out of compliance. We are saying where we looked, and that anyone can ask for what we did not find.

Now the careful part. Policy 436 states: “It is used by the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office to convert data associated with vehicle license plates for official law enforcement purposes”. It would be easy to publish that as proof the office runs plate readers. We are not going to, because this manual comes from Lexipol, a vendor that supplies policy manuals to agencies as templates with the agency’s name merged in, and this copy shows the merge unfinished: four times it refers to the “AdministrationDivision Commander,” two words run together where a field was filled. A sentence produced by a template is evidence about the template.

Against that sentence, the county board’s own record for the window we read contains no reference to plate readers, to automated license plate readers, or to Flock Safety. Every one of the 53 mentions of ALPR in our whole corpus is inside the policy manual itself.

So the honest statement is that the Sheriff’s Office publishes a detailed plate reader policy and its governing body’s record shows no plate reader purchase. Which of those describes the ground is a records request, and ours is drafted.

One more thing about that manual. Its filename says 2023. Every page of Policy 436 is stamped “Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/08/20”, and it cites a statute that did not exist in 2023. If you go looking for it, cite the stamp rather than the filename.

The office also publishes a drone policy, Policy 605, written to Oregon’s unmanned aircraft statutes. It says the aircraft “shall not be used: • To conduct random surveillance activities”, nor to target anyone based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, economic status, age, cultural group or disability, nor to harass or intimidate. Retention is not given in days; it points at a state records schedule we have not read.

The clause worth acting on is this one:

“The Patrol Commander supervisor shall ensure that an annual report is provided to the Oregon Department of Aviation that summarizes the frequency of UAS use and the purpose for the use”

Those annual reports are public records held by one state agency. A single request would return frequency and purpose reporting for every flying agency in Oregon, not just this one.

In February 2026 the county approved an Axon Enterprise invoice for $46,486.07. What it bought is not stated. Axon sells stun weapons, body cameras, in-car video, evidence management, aircraft and plate readers, and an accounts payable line distinguishes none of them. The account code is 101-204-93901, and the report does not name the department behind 204 anywhere we could read, so this is a county payment to Axon rather than a Sheriff’s Office purchase.

Lincoln City police ran a Flock plate reader program for about two weeks. The department announced it on 16 December 2025, and by 2 January 2026 a sergeant told the Newport News Times the department had already ended the contract over substantial coming rate increases. Camera count, locations and contract value are not in the reporting. Retired plate reader programs are not unusual, and this site covers several.

We read 187 machine readable documents from July 2025 onward. There is no city record here at all. Lincoln City’s website is unread.

Who approves it

These systems were approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where they meet and how comment works.

How to show up in Lincoln County →

Trackers

Meetings, contracts, records

Nothing listed yet. The trackers launch here, and facts appear only with their sources.

How the inventory works →

What you can do

Civic action

Show up

Public comment is open to any resident, and you do not have to be an expert to use it. The hub says what to expect in each room, how long you get to speak, and where to check the schedule before you go.

How to show up in Lincoln County →

Personal protection

Protect yourself

Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.

Surveillance Self-Defense ↗

Get the digest

A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.

Subscribe to the newsletter

One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.