Nye County Sheriff | LensLock body cameras
Four bidders, four prices, then three ruled non-responsive and one price left. Nye County awarded a five-year body camera contract worth just over two million dollars to the only bidder still standing, and the storage terms behind it have never been published.
At a glance
- What was awarded
- Bid 2023-22, a five-year contract with LensLock, Inc. at $2,000,319.45, approved 17 January 2024 [2]
- The four bids, as advertised two weeks earlier
- Axon Enterprise $3,525,250.50; LensLock $2,275,425.00; PCN Strategies $2,302,528.88; Utility Associates $2,311,500.00 [1]
- How many survived the responsiveness review
- One. Three of the four were ruled non-responsive [2]
- Stated grounds for rejection
- "concealability factor, redaction services, and warranties, among others" [2]
- How it is paid for
- A U.S. Department of Justice grant of $314,000 with a 50% match, then Public Safety Sales and Use Tax funds, with $463,000 more planned across the remaining years [3] [2]
- Retention period, access rules, deletion terms
- not published. County staff told a resident the contract includes a five-year data storage component that is "very extensive"; the contract itself is not in the county's papers [4]
- The written policy NRS 289.830 requires
- not found. The statute requires six named elements including a fifteen-day retention floor. A policy is an agency record and would not appear in the board's papers [5]
How it happened
- Decision
Four bidders, four prices
The Board of Commissioners agenda lists Bid 2023-22 for body worn cameras with four vendors and four amounts, ranging from LensLock at $2,275,425.00 to Axon at $3,525,250.50. [1]
- Decision
Three bids out, one price left, five-year contract awarded
Counsel told the board three of the four bids were non-responsive and the one responsive bid was LensLock at $2,000,319.45. A captain gave the grounds as concealability, redaction services and warranties. Counsel recorded that requirements were met, a notice of award had issued and no protest was filed. Commissioner Strickland objected to the volume of back-up material. Two residents spoke in support. The award passed on a five-year contract funded from grants and Public Safety Sales and Use Tax funds. [2]
- Debate
A resident asks where the footage goes
Adopting the Public Safety Sales and Use Tax plan for the Town of Pahrump, a resident said the data security was not spelled out as clearly as he was looking for. County staff answered that part of the LensLock contract was a five-year data storage contract that was very extensive and included a lot of components. The plan was adopted four votes to none. That exchange is the whole published record on the storage terms. [4]
A competitive bid that ended with one competitor
Nye County ran this properly by the visible measures. It advertised, it took four bids, it printed all four prices on a public agenda, it reviewed them for responsiveness, it issued a notice of award, and it waited out the protest period. Nobody protested.
The outcome is still that a five-year, two million dollar surveillance contract was decided without a second price to weigh it against. Three of the four bids were ruled non-responsive on grounds a captain summarised to the board as “concealability factor, redaction services, and warranties, among others”. After that review there was one bid left, and the board voted on it.
We are not suggesting anything improper, and nothing in the record suggests it. Responsiveness reviews exist precisely so that a bid which does not meet the specification cannot win on price alone. But the specification is what decided this purchase, and the specification is not in the board’s papers.
There is also a number nobody explained. LensLock’s price on the 3 January agenda was $2,275,425.00. The figure the board awarded on 17 January was $2,000,319.45. The minutes record the second number without reference to the first.
The part that was never published
The most consequential thing about a body camera system is not the camera. It is the storage: how long the footage lives, who can pull it up, what happens when someone asks for it, and what the vendor is allowed to do with it.
On 1 October 2024 a resident asked. County staff answered that the contract includes a five-year data storage component that is “very extensive and included a lot of components”, and the board adopted the spending plan four votes to none.
That is the entire public record. The contract is not in the county’s published papers, and Nevada has no statute requiring a plate reader policy, though it does require a body camera policy with six specific elements. We did not find that policy either.
Where the money comes from, which is the part you can watch
The first year came from a $314,000 U.S. Department of Justice grant, matched with $314,000 of local money. Everything after that comes from the Public Safety Sales and Use Tax, a levy the Nevada Legislature created in 2007.
That matters for anyone who wants to keep track. Every year the Board of Commissioners has to adopt a spending plan for that tax, and it does so town by town, and the plans name the equipment: cloud storage, body worn and vehicle cameras, the software and licensing behind them. It is an annual, scheduled, public moment when this county’s surveillance budget is written down in one place and voted on in the open.
You do not need a records request to see that. You need the agenda, once a year.
What we do not know
- The LensLock contract itself: retention period, who may access footage, deletion terms, and whether the vendor may use the recordings for any purpose of its own.
- Why the awarded figure of $2,000,319.45 is about $275,000 below the $2,275,425.00 LensLock advertised two weeks earlier. The minutes do not explain it.
- Whether the Sheriff's Office has adopted the written body camera policy NRS 289.830 requires, and whether it contains all six named elements including the fifteen-day retention floor.
- What the redaction workflow is in practice, given that redaction services were one of the stated grounds for rejecting competing bids.
What you can do
Show up
Systems like this one are approved by boards, councils and committees that meet in public. We have confirmed where each of them meets in Nye County and how public comment works there.
How to show up in Nye County →Protect yourself
Practical steps to shrink your personal data trail. Our guides publish at launch; until then, EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense is the best starting point.
Surveillance Self-Defense →Sources
- 1. Nye County Board of County Commissioners agenda, 3 January 2024, item 20 · Meeting record · · accessed
- 2. Nye County Board of County Commissioners minutes, 17 January 2024, item 28 · Meeting record · · accessed
- 3.
- 4.
- 5. Nevada Revised Statutes 289.830, portable event recording devices · Law · accessed
Get the digest
A regular digest of what changed in the world of surveillance: the counties we published, the devices that appeared on the map, and the public meetings where these decisions get made. We send it when there is enough to report.
One click to unsubscribe. What we do with your address is on the newsletter page.